Partly allowed

Shaikh Nizam Shaikh Jainoddin v. State of Maha and Ors.

Bombay HC6 Oct 2017WP/5487/2003

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition challenged a caste invalidity order. The court noted that two real sisters of the petitioner received caste validity certificates during the proceedings. As the committee missed these documents, the court remanded the matter for fresh reconsideration.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order was quashed and set aside. The matter was remanded to the Committee to decide afresh within six months.

Shaikh Nizam Shaikh Jainoddin Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

1 wp 5487.03

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 5487 OF 2003

¶4

Shaikh Nizam Shaikh Jainoddin .. Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents

¶7

Shri S. R. Barlinge, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri P. S. Patil, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Shri S. T. Shelke, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4.

¶8

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND S. M. GAVHANE, JJ. DATE : 06TH OCTOBER, 2017.

¶9

FINAL ORDER :

¶10

. Mr. Barlinge, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the caste claim of the petitioner as Julaha caste (O.B.C.) is invalidated. According to the learned counsel, subsequently two real sisters of the petitioner have been granted with validity certificates of Julaha caste (O.B.C.) on 20.08.2016 and 07.07.2012. The learned counsel submits that, when the real sisters have been granted with validity, the petitioner also deserves to be granted the same.

¶11

The learned counsel submits that, the documents filed on record before the Committee also show the caste Julaha in

¶12

2 wp 5487.03

¶13

respect of the grandfather and the relatives and in some documents Musalman is written. It is not contra evidence.

¶14

Mr. Patil, the learned Additional Government Pleader submits that, the fact of rejection of validity of present petitioner was not brought to the notice of Committee while considering claims of the sisters.

¶15

We have considered the submissions canvassed by the learned counsel for parties.

¶16

The validities are granted to two real sisters of the petitioner during the pendency of present writ petition. The committee had no occasion to go through those validities granted in favour of sisters of the petitioner while considering claim of the petitioner. Considering that, the real sisters have been granted validity subsequently, we deem it appropriate to remit the matter back to the committee.

¶17

In the light of the above, we pass the following order.

¶18

The impugned order is quashed and set aside. The parties are relegated before the Committee. The petitioner shall appear before the Committee on 02.11.2017. The petitioner is entitled to produce additional documents before the Committee. The

¶19

3 wp 5487.03

¶20

Committee after considering additional documents produced, so also the documents which are already filed on record and after hearing the petitioner shall decide said proceeding afresh expeditiously and preferably within a period of six (06) months from the date of appearance of the petitioner. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Rule discharged. No costs.

¶21

[S. M. GAVHANE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]

¶22

bsb/Oct. 17

Shaikh Nizam Shaikh Jainoddin v. State of Maha and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaikh Nizam Shaikh Jainoddin v. State of Maha and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The G.M.I.D.C. Thr the Exe Engineer, Latur Minor Irrigation Division Latur Vs Mahesh Maroti Cheulwar and Ors.

Kunalsingh Khushalsingh Shisodiya Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Narayan Vishawanath Waybat and Others Vs Navalkishor Ram and Others

The Voice Chancellor Ycmou Nashik and Others Vs Usha Sanjaykumar Gajare and Another

Shiva Trusts Supriyadidi Sule College of Nursing through Its Administrative Officer S R Pawar Vs the Indian Nursing Council through Its Registrar and Others

Kalpana Pradeep Hajare and Others Vs the Additional Divisional Commissioner Aurangabad and Others