This court dismissed a writ petition solely because it was withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel. No substantive legal proposition was laid down in the judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5178 OF 2017 (Pyaribi Javaje Nabi Patel and another Vs. Madulal Hojdar Pathan and others)
Mr.Z.M.Pathan, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr.H.D.Deshmukh, learned counsel for respondent No.1.
( CORAM : M.S.Sanklecha, J.)
DATE : 19/04/2017
PER COURT :
instructions, seeks to withdraw this petition.
khs/APR.2017/5178
Pyaribi Javaje Nabi Patel and another
Madulal Hojdar Pathan and others
M.S.Sanklecha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
