High Court Bench at Aurangabad ordered the competent authority to examine the petitioner's representation for Assured Career Progression benefit within three months.
Direction to the competent authority to examine the representation on Assured Career Progression and decide within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp4930.16
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.4930 OF 2016
Shankar s/o Narsinh Dange
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Mah. & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr T.M. Venjane, Advocate for petitioner; Mrs V.N. Patil-Jadhav, A.G.P. for respondent no.1; Mr S.D. Dhongade, Advocate for respondents no.4 & 5
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & N.W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE : 7th August, 2017
P.C.
The petitioner, a retired employee claims that he is entitled for grant of benefit of Assured Career Progress on his completion of 12 years and 24 years of the service period.
wp4930.16
(2)
(N.W. SAMBRE, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
amj
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of Assured Career Progression on completion of 12 and 24 years of service.
Whether the authority has decided the petitioner's representation regarding Assured Career Progression benefit.
Shankar s/o Narsinh Dange
The State of Mah.
Shantanu S. Kemkar
N.W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
