Disposed

Sadashiv Gajaba Kakade v. District Resettlement Officer, Satara and Ors.

Bombay HC5 Apr 2017WP/4447/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge bench addressed a writ petition concerning delayed allotment of alternate land acquired for the Dhom Project. The court directed the Rehabilitation Officer to treat the petition as a representation and dispose of it within three months.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition was disposed of by directing the Rehabilitation Officer to treat it as a representation and decide within three months.

Sadashiv Gajaba Kakade Vs District Resettlement Officer… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

1 WPL 2009-17.doc-9

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION (STAMP) NO.2009 OF 2017

¶5

Sadashiv Gajaba Kakade. Through constituted POA Shri Dhondiram Bhagwan Bhosale	] ] ]	… Petitioner
Versus
District Resettlement Officer, Satara	]
& Ors.	]	… Respondents

¶6

Mr. I. M. Khairadi for Petitioner. Mrs. M. P. Thakur, AGP for State.

¶7

CORAM :- DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J., & G. S. KULKARNI, J. DATE :- 5 APRIL 2017

¶8

P. C. :-

¶9

The petitioner, through his Power of Attorney, is before this Court pertaining to lands admeasuring 34R in Gat No.43/21147/3 and 1H 21R in Gat No.43/26-113/5 at Village – Velang, Taluka – Wai, District - Satara. According to the petitioner, the land was acquired for Dhom Project and he has lost possession of the land way back in 1969 to 1970. According to him, he has already deposited amount which is required to be deposited for allotment of alternate land which was received as compensation but still the authorities are

1 of 2

URS

2 WPL 2009-17.doc-9

not allotting any alternate land. According to the petitioner, on demand, he has deposited the amount but till date nothing has happened in spite of identifying alternate land. The land in question was taken away in 1969 and we are in 2017. Till date, the petitioner is neither benefited by the amount of compensation he received nor got alternate land. This cannot be the state of land losers or project affected persons. In similar matters pertaining to Dhom Irrigation Project in Writ Petition No.6915 of 2016 and connected matters, we disposed of the matters directing the Rehabilitation Officer to treat each of the Writ Petitions as representations and on due consideration of the grievances of the petitioners, consider and dispose of Writ Petitions in accordance with law. In this matter also, we direct the Rehabilitation Officer concerned to treat the Writ Petition as representation and dispose of the same within a period of three months from today, according to the procedure contemplated.

¶14

Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶15

(G. S. KULKARNI, J.)

¶16

(CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶17

2 of 2

¶18

URS

Sadashiv Gajaba Kakade v. District Resettlement Officer, Satara and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sadashiv Gajaba Kakade v. District Resettlement Officer, Satara and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Arvind Amrutlal Harsora and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Revenue and Rehabilitation Dept. and Ors.

Rajendra Harikishan Dhawan and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra, through Public Works Dept and Ors.

Shri. Subhash Abaji Gite Vs the Special Land, Acquisition Officer, Jal Vidyut Project, Nashik and Ors.

Shri Sonu Hari More (Decd) through Lrs. Chokhu S. More Vs District Resettlement Officer, Satara and Ors.

Shri. Narayan Kondiba Dhanavde (Lrs.) Shri Dondiba Laxman Dhanavade Vs District Resettlement Officer, Pune and Ors.

Shri Narayan Govind Jadhav Vs District Resettlement Officer, Pune and Ors.