Court, learned Additional Public Prosecutor was expected to communicate the interim order to the concerned police station. It is his contention that the learned Additional Public Prosecutor Shri. Borade had informed about the order at 12.05 p.m. to the concerned police station on telephone. It is contended that the investigating officer, respondent No.3, and his assistant respondent No.4 ignored the order made by this Court and arrested him at 2.30 p.m. in the aforesaid crime. It is contended that he was produced before the Judicial Magistrate and he was committed to custody till 2-8-2008. It is contended that on 31-7-2008 itself learned counsel for the petitioner had collected the order made by this Court and the Advocate had approached the concerned police station with the order but the police turned blind eye towards the order and no further steps were taken. It is contended that after showing the order when request was made to the investigating officer to release the petitioner on bail, he was not released on bail. It is contended that due to this conduct of the respondents, he remained in custody till 9- 9-2008. It appears that anticipatory bail application filed in this Court came to be disposed of due to the arrest.
