Petitioner challenged an order dismissing his private complaint alleging alteration of land records (Sections 166, 167, 466 IPC). The High Court held that since respondents were not Talathis during the relevant period, the accusation lacked substance.
Writ petition dismissed; no orders as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
hcs
1 904.w4340.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITON NO.4340 OF 2015
Abdulla Ibrahim Aaklekar .. Petitioner. Vs.
Ankush Laxman Salve & Ors. .. Respondents.
Mr.M.Saeed for the Petitioner.
Mr.A.D. Kamkhedkar APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. K. MENON, J. DATED : 14TH JUNE, 2017
P.C. :
2 904.w4340.15
respondents with malafide intention deleted the names of the petitioner and his brother. The petitioner filed private complaint alleging offences under Section 166, 167 and 466 of the Indian Penal Code. The Judicial Magistrate, First Class issued process which came to be questioned in the revision application and by the impugned order the revision application was allowed.
(i) Writ petition is dismissed.
(ii) No orders as to the costs.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order allowing the revision of the private complaint for altering land records is perverse.
Whether the accusation against respondents based on their role as Talathis during the relevant period has substance given their transfer.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Abdulla Ibrahim Aaklekar
Ankush Laxman Salve
A. K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
