Petitioner, aggrieved by confirmation of a temporary injunction maintaining status quo in a regular suit, approached this Court via writ petition. This Court recorded that the status quo order was already in place and disposed of the writ petition without adjudicating on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 3919.2013.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3919 OF 2013
PITAMBAR MUKUNDA BADGUJAR VERSUS PURUSHOTTAM MUKUNDA BADGUJAR
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr Manoj Shinde h/f B R Kedar Advocate for Respondents : Adv S R Dheple
CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J. Dated: November 01, 2017
PER COURT :-
aaa/-
WP 3919.2013.odt
judge of the trial court shall dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of this order. Writ petition accordingly disposed of. No costs.
sd/-
…
aaa/-
PITAMBAR MUKUNDA BADGUJAR
PURUSHOTTAM MUKUNDA BADGUJAR
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
