Criminal Writ Petition challenging a Bar order in an NIA matter. The High Court disposed of the petition without adjudicating on the legality of the impugned summary proceedings order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Megha 25_wp_379_2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.379 OF 2015
Mr. Rajeev Satyanarayan Somani ...Petitioner Versus Mr. Vinod Shenoy & Ors. ...Respondents
...
Mr. Subodh Desai for the Petitioner.
Mr. Tejas Luniya i/b. Thodur Law Associates for Respondent No.1. Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for Respondent No.2-State.
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : 6th JANUARY, 2017.
P. C. :
The learned APP appearing for the Respondent No.2-State
tendered across the Bar order dated 16th June, 2016 passed by the
learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raigad-Alibag in the First Information Report subject matter of challenge in this Petition. The Investigating Officer had filed a report praying for grant of 'B' Summary. By the said order dated 16th June, 2016 'B' Summary as prayed for is granted by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate. Hence, nothing survives in the Petition and the same is disposed of. We make it clear that we have made no adjudication on the legality and validity of order dated 16th June, 2016.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
Megha
1/1
Megha
Vinod Shenoy
Oka, A.S.
Prabhudesai, Anuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
