The Bombay High Court allowed the present writ petition (WP No. 3774 of 2007) on the very terms of its earlier decision in Writ Petition No. 4575 of 2012, recorded in an order dated 24th July, 2017.
The writ petition is allowed on the terms in which Writ Petition No. 4575 of 2012 stands allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 3774.07
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3774 OF 2007
Chintan Himmatsing Thakur .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Arun H. Koralkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri P. S. Patil, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
CORAM : S. C. DHARMADHIKARI AND MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 28TH JULY, 2017.
PER COURT :
. It is stated that, the issue raised in this petition is covered by judgment and order passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 4575 of 2012 decided by this Court on 24th July, 2017. The writ petition therefore, is allowed on the very terms in which Writ Petition No. 4575 of 2012 stands allowed. No order as to costs.
[MANGESH S. PATIL, J.] [S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.]
bsb/July 17
1 issue framed by the court
The issue to be determined regarding the applicability of the earlier judgment in Writ Petition No. 4575 of 2012.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition No. 4575 of 2012Referred¶10
Writ Petition No. 4575 of 2012
Chintan Himmatsing Thakur
The State of Maharashtra
S. C. Dharmadhikari
Mangesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
