This judgment records the dismissal of Writ Petition No. 357 of 2002 due to non-prosecution by the petitioner who remained absent continuously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
917.wp.357.2002.doc
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 357 OF 2002
Chief Officer, Trimbak Municipal Council ...Petitioner vs Gangaram Budha Lachake & Anr. ...Respondents.
None for the parties.
CORAM : G.S.KULKARNI , J. 07 MARCH, 2017
P.C. :
There was no interim order passed in this Petition. The Advocate for the Petitioner is absent, nor the Petitioner is represented by his representative. Even on the last occasion i.e. 6th July, 2005 the Petitioner was not present. The Petition is of the year 2002. It appears that the Petitioner is not interested to prosecute this Petition. The Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Pg 1 of 1
Chief Officer, Trimbak Municipal Council
Gangaram Budha Lachake & Anr.
G.S.KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
