This court dismissed Writ Petition No. 340 of 2003 for default due to the absence of the petitioner and his advocate, despite the petition being listed for dismissal on the board.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssk 1/1 WP 340/03-3/2/17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 340 OF 2003
Nitin B. Shah
… Petitioner
vs.
Sandesh Dattatraya Desai & ors. … Respondents
None for the petitioner. Mr. V. V. Gangurde, A.P.P. for the State/respondent no.5.
Coram : Smt. R. P. SondurBaldota, J. Date : 3rd February, 2017
P.C. :
Though the petition is shown on the board for dismissal, the petitioner and his advocate are absent. The petition is dismissed for default.
[Smt. R. P. SondurBaldota, J.]
Nitin B. Shah
Sandesh Dattatraya Desai & ors.
R. P. SondurBaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
