The High Court dismissed an appeal against the rejection of the petitioner's parole application. The rejection was upheld because the submitted medical certificate regarding the petitioner's wife's illness was insufficient without other reports to substantiate the necessity of surgery.
Rule discharged; appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9. cri wp 3180-17.doc
RMA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3180 OF 2017
Santosh Mohan Rajput
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
Appearances
| Ms. Rohini M. Dandekar | Advocate (appointed) for the Petitioner |
|---|---|
| Mrs. G.P. Mulekar | APP for the State |
CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI &
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 19, 2017.
ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] :
ground of illness of his wife. The said application came to be rejected by order dated 23.9.2016. Being aggrieved thereby,
the petitioner preferred an appeal. The appeal was dismissed by order dated 2.3.2017.
jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2
9. cri wp 3180-17.doc
[ DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ]
jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the parole application be interfered with given the lack of medical reports substantiating the claim of the petitioner's wife's need for surgery.
Santosh Mohan Rajput
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Tahilramani
Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
