The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed a writ petition challenging an order of issuance of process, declining to exercise writ jurisdiction as an alternate efficacious remedy was available.
Writ petition dismissed with liberty to file proceedings before the Sessions Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Phjayani
13 WP 2983.17.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2983 OF 2017
Shreenath Chintamani Bhandari & Ors. ….Petitioners Versus
Smt. Tarabai Jagannath Verma & Anr. ….Respondents
Mr. Vasant D. Raut for the petitioner. Mr. S.V. Gavand, APP for the respondent/state.
CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATE : 09th OCTOBER, 2017
P.C. :
(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise its writ jurisdiction given the availability of an alternate efficacious remedy.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shreenath Chintamani Bhandari & Ors.
Smt. Tarabai Jagannath Verma & Anr.
Anuja Prabhu Dessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
