Partly allowed

Bhaichand Hirachand Raisoni Multi State Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. Thu Itsliquidator J G Kandar v. the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Nashik and Another

Bombay HC9 Oct 2017WP/2970/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition challenged an order regularizing condonation of delay. The court quashed the order to facilitate a fresh hearing before the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner regarding dues, while accepting recovery facts.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order dated 08.12.2016 was quashed and proceedings remitted to Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Nashik for a fresh hearing.

Bhaichand Hirachand Raisoni Multi State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

8wp2970o17

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 2970 OF 2017

¶5

BHAICHAND HIRACHAND RAISONI MULTI STATE COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER NASHIK AND ANOTHER.

¶8

Advocate for the Petitioner : Shri V.D.Hon, Senior Advocate h/f Shri Hon Ashwin V..

¶9

Advocate for the Respondents : Shri K B Choudhari.

¶10

CORAM: RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

¶11

DATE :- 09^th October, 2017.

¶12

Per Court:

¶13

1 I have considered the submissions of Shri Hon, learned Senior

¶14

Counsel for the Petitioner and Shri Chaudhari, learned Advocate for the Respondent/ Employees' Provident Fund Department.

¶15

2 Shri Chaudhari informs that the Enforcement Officer is present in the Court.

¶16

3 Considering the order that I intend to pass, I am not required

¶17

to advert to the entire submissions of the learned Advocates. Suffice it to

¶18

say that Shri Chaudhari submits, on instructions, that more than Rs.5

¶19

crore have been recovered by the Provident Fund Department and about

¶20

¶21

8wp2970o17

¶22

Rs.6 crore are due towards the Petitioner.

¶23

4 Since the thrust of the Petitioner's grievance is that the law issues and factual aspects were not considered as the Petitioner was not given a reasonable opportunity of hearing, I do not find that this petition needs to be kept pending in this Court as the issue of provident fund dues is the subject matter.

¶24

5 Considering the above and keeping in view that more than Rs.5 crore have been recovered and Rs.6 crore are said to be due, the impugned order dated 08.12.2016 can be quashed only to facilitate a rehearing in the matter.

¶25

6 In the light of the above, this Writ Petition is partly allowed. The impugned order dated 08.12.2016 is quashed and set aside and the proceedings No.MH/NK/52678/Compliance/ C-III/ 1742 are remitted to the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Nashik for a fresh hearing. All contentions of the parties are kept open.

¶26

7 The learned Advocates for the respective sides pray that a particular date for appearance after vacation may be granted so that the Petitioner would prepare the entire record to be placed before the Authority.

¶27

8 The request is accepted. The Petitioner shall, therefore, appear before the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Nashik on 03.11.2017 at 11:00 am. Formal notice need not be issued. The Petitioner

¶28

3 8wp2970o17

¶29

shall, thereafter, abide by the dates of hearing on which the matter is posted. The Petitioner is at liberty to raise all contentions including legal objections and is also at liberty to tender written notes of arguments, if so advised.

¶30

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )

¶31

kps

Bhaichand Hirachand Raisoni Multi State Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. Thu Itsliquidator J G Kandar v. the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Nashik and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhaichand Hirachand Raisoni Multi State Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. Thu Itsliquidator J G Kandar v. the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Nashik and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surajbans Rathor Samaj Public Trust Thro. Chairman and Trustees-Kasturchand and Others Vs Jaipal Bhajandas Katariya and Others

Waseem Anees Shaikh and Another Vs Jaivant Shivaji Ingle

Waseem Anees Shaikh and Another Vs Jaivant Shivaji Ingle

Navnath Jalindar Rakshe Vs Vidya Navnath Rakhse

Sahebrao Vithoba Jadhav and Others Vs Sub Divisional Officer Sub Divisional Office Ahmednagar and Others

Vijaya Vithalrao Ingle @ Vijaya P.Suryawanshi Vs Shahaji Dattaji Patil and Others