Three writ petitions before the Bombay High Court were disposed of following a Division Bench judgment passed in Writ Petition No.8587/2016 along with companion matters.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk 1 910-WP-2897-17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2897 OF 2017
Antarbharati Shikshan Mandal & Ors. ..Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors. ..Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2942 OF 2017
Shri Vijay Aappaso Shahapure ..Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors. ..Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.11288 OF 2015
Kankavali Shikshan Sanstha, Kankavali & Ors. ..Petitioners Vs. The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Social Welfare Dept. and Anr. ..Respondents
Mr.Prashant Bhavake for the Petitioners in above three Writ Petitions. Mr. V. N. Sagare, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5. Mr. B. G. Ligade i/b P. M. Arjunwadkar for the Respondent Nos.7 and 8.
CORAM: B. R. GAVAI AND RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE: 2nd AUGUST 2017
P.C. :
. In view of the judgment and order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.8587/2016 along with the companion matters on 10/07/2017, the aforesaid Writ Petitions are disposed of.
Sd/Sd/- (RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (B. R. GAVAI, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition No.8587/2016Followed¶15
Antarbharati Shikshan Mandal & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.
Shri Vijay Aappaso Shahapure
The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.
Kankavali Shikshan Sanstha, Kankavali & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Social Welfare Dept. and Anr.
B. R. GAVAI
RIYAZ I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
