This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
921 WRIT PETITION NO. 2889 OF 2016
PRAVIN NAGNATH PALDEWAR THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR PRAVINNAGNATH PALDEWAR
VERSUS
THE REGIONAL MANAGER CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION MUMBAI
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S.C. Yeramwar Advocate for Respondent No.1 :Mr. V.D. Salunke i/b Miss T. V.
Waghmare Advocate for Respondent No.2 :Mr. S.B. Deshpande
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & P.R. BORA, JJ. Date: March 22, 2017
PER COURT :-
1 It is not a matter of dispute that the petitioner is not a lowest offerer. The tender offer of the lowest offerer has been accepted by the Central Warehousing Corporation. The petitioner questions the eligibility conditions incorporated in the tender document.
2 Since the petitioner is found not entitled on merits, we do not propose to consider the questions raised in the instant petition. Keeping option of the petitioner open to agitate the same in an appropriate petition, at an appropriate stage, since the petition is rendered infructuous, petition stands disposed of.
vbd
Pravin Nag Nath Paldewar
Central Warehousing Corporation
R. M. BORDE
P.R. BORA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
