Single judge order disposing of a writ petition where the petitioner filed a withdrawal request at hearing, identifying the petitioner for the process, and the court allowed the withdrawal.
Writ proceedings disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
939 WRIT PETITION NO. 2856 OF 2013
MATHURALAL PANDURANG MUNDADA, L.RS. BHAGWANDAS AND ANOTHER VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. M.S. Karad h/f. Mr. B.T. Bodkhe AGP for Respondents 1 to 6 : Mr. A.S. Shinde
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J. DATED : July 6, 2017.
ORDER :
Bodkhe submits on instruction that he wants to withdraw the
proceeding. He submits that petitioner No. 1 is present in the court hall. It is up to him to identify petitioner No. 1. Disposed of as withdrawn.
[ T.V. NALAWADE, J. ]
ssc/
MATHURALAL PANDURANG MUNDADA, L.RS. BHAGWANDAS AND ANOTHER
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
T.V. NALAWADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
