The Bench held that the petition survives only upon the petitioner obtaining CRZ clearance from MCZMA. The Corporation to grant sanction to plans after such NOC. Petition disposed of.
Petition disposed of; Corporation directed to grant sanction after MCZMA grants NOC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
WP/2789/2016
BDPPS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2789 OF 2016
Nina Bagai Hajela
….Petitioner.
V/s
Union of India and Others
…. Respondents.
Mr. Saket Mone a/w Mr. Subit Chakraborty i/b Vidhi Partners for the Petitioner.
Mr. D.P. Singh a/w Mr. Dhanesh Shah for Respondent No.1-UOI.
Ms. Sharmila Deshmukh for Respondent No.2.
Ms. Shobha Ajit Kumar a/w Mr. Sagar Patil for Respondent/BMC.
CORAM: V.M. KANADE & P. R. BORA, JJ.
DATE: 14th February, 2017 P.C.:-
1] The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Corporation submits that pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated 05/08/2016, Corporation has processed the application of the Petitioner and is willing to grant sanction provided the Petitioner obtains CRZ clearance from MCZMA. The note-sheet of the Municipal Corporation for Greater Bombay dated 02/02/2017 is taken on record.
2/2
WP/2789/2016
2] In view of the above statement made on behalf of the Corporation, nothing survives in this Petition. The Corporation may grant its sanction to the plans submitted by the Petitioner, after MCZMA grants its NOC.
3] Petition is accordingly disposed of.
(V. M. KANADE, J.)
Nina Bagai Hajela
Union of India
BMC
V. M. Kanade
P. R. Bora
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
