Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution was disposed of as it was withdrawn in favor of the petitioner by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay.
Leave to withdraw permitted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5 wp 2655-17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2655 OF 2017
Nitin Subhedar Jagtap ..Petitioner
v/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
..Respondents
Ms. Saima Ansari i/b. Khan Fakhruddin for the Petitioner. Mr. M.G.Patil, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 29, 2017.
P.C.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)
1 of 1
pps
Nitin Subhedar Jagtap
The State of Maharashtra
Anuja Prabhudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
