Writ petitions were withdrawn by the petitioners on the ground that the vehicle and material had been released. The High Court granted leave and dismissed the petitions accordingly.
Leave to withdraw writ petitions granted; petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
901-903 wp 2626-2628.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NOS. 2626, 2627 AND 2628 OF 2017
Kishorbhai Gosabhai Vaishnav and ors. …..Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra …..Respondent
Mr. Nitin Gangal, advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K. V. Saste, APP for the State in the writ petition No.2626 of 2017. Mrs. Aruna S. Pai, APP for the State in the writ petition No.2627 of 2017. Mrs. M. H. Mhatre, APP for the State in the writ petition No.2628 of 2017.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 20th JULY, 2017.
P. C. :
Mr. Gangal, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the subject vehicle as well as the material and container have already been released by Kharghar Police Station. In that view of the matter, Mr.Gangal states that the grievance of the petitioners, no more survives and, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the petitions. Leave as prayed for, is granted. The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) [RANJIT MORE, J.]
1/1
Shubhada S Kadam
Kishorbhai Gosabhai Vaishnav and ors.
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
