Disposed

Pooja Singh Gujral and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC7 Sept 2017WP/2558/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court directed the Respondents to inquire into specific complaints if not already done and communicate the outcome within six weeks. The Writ Petition is disposed of based on this direction, subject to the prayers not otherwise considered.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondents to inquire into specific complaints and communicate outcome within six weeks; Writ Petition disposed of.

Pooja Singh Gujral and Anr. Vs the… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

(22) wp-2558.17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2558 OF 2017

¶4

Pooja Singh Gujral and anr. : Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. : Respondents.

¶5

Mr. Shyam Dewani a/w Ms. Akansha Helaskar and Ms. Heena Kopoori i/by Dewani and Associates for the Petitioners. Mrs. M M Deshmukh, Addl. PP for the Respondent/State.

¶6

CORAM : R. M. SAVANT & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 07^th September 2017

¶7

P.C.

¶8

1 By prayer clause (a) of the above Writ Petition, the Petitioners seek

¶9

relief that all papers relating to the investigation conducted by the Respondents in respect of the complaints dated 03/04/2017, 05/04/2017 and 24/06/2017 be placed before this Court.

¶10

2 In so far as the said complaints are concerned, they are comprised in the statements recorded of the Petitioners on 05/04/2017. Thereafter there are written complaints dated 05/04/2017 and 24/06/2017 as also a complaint dated 23/06/2017 addressed to the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai. We therefore direct the Respondents to inquire into the said complaints if not already inquired, and if inquired, communicate the outcome of the said inquiry to the Petitioners. If the inquiry is to be carried out and the outcome is to be communicated, the same to be done within six weeks from date. If only the

1 of 2

lgc

(22) wp-2558.17

outcome is to be communicated, the same to be done within two weeks from date. It would be contingent upon such inquiry and communication of the outcome that the future course of action would be open to the Petitioners. It is therefore not necessary to keep the above Writ Petition pending. With the directions as aforesaid the above Writ Petition is disposed of. Needless to clarify that save and except the prayer clause (a) of the above Writ Petition, other prayers have not been considered by this Court.

¶15

3 All concerned parties to act upon an ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by the Court Associate/Sheristedar.

¶16

[SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J] [R.M.SAVANT, J]

¶17

2 of 2

¶18

lgc

Pooja Singh Gujral and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pooja Singh Gujral and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sayed Ali Makbul Ali Sayed Makbul and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sikandar Ismail Gaiban and Ors. Vs Shaukat Allabaksh Desai and Anr.

Sambhaji Balkrishna Sawant Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sadashiv Daulat Khandekar and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Dilip Laxman Kadam Vs the State of Maharashtra

M/S. Maitreya Services Private Limited and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.