The Court directed the Municipal Corporation to decide the petitioner's eligibility for alternate accommodation within six weeks, clarifying no adjudication on merits was made.
Direct the Respondents to decide the petitioners eligibility for alternate accommodation within six weeks from the date of upload.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2485 OF 2017
Mr. Keshav Sadashiv Shigam.
… Petitioner.
V/s.
The Commissioner of Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr.
... Respondents.
Mr. Sandeep V. Bane for the Petitioner. Ms. Kejali Mastakar for the Respondents.
CORAM : A.S. Oka and M.S. Sonak, JJ.
DATED : 11 December, 2017.
P.C. :-
Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents. It is not in dispute that the decision on the issue of eligibility for allotment of alternate accommodation to the Petitioner in lieu of his shop premises is not yet taken.
2
(i) We direct the Respondents to decide the issue of eligibility of the Petitioner as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of six weeks from the date on which this order is uploaded.
(ii) We make it clear that we have made no adjudication on merits.
order.
JPP
The Commissioner of Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Anr.
A.S. Oka
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
