Writ petition filed challenging an order under the Right to Information Act was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh proceedings, with merits kept open.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh petitions or proceedings; merits of the case kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dusane
20 wp 2260.2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2260 OF 2015
Dr. Pardeshi Balkrishna Patil
… Petitioner
vs.
Slum Re-Development Authority (SRA) & Ors.
… Respondents
Mr. Omprakash Parihar i/by Mr. Ganesh Gole for the Petitioner
Ms. Jamuna Parekh a/w Mr. Sagar Patil for Respondent nos.2 to 5. Shoma Maitra i/by Wadia Ghandy for Respondent no. 7. Mr. K.R. Trivedi, AGP for Respondent no. 8.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & M.S. KARNIK, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 31, 2017
P.C.:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
2 The petition is allowed to be withdrawn as prayed with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh petition or appropriate proceedings as the case may be, after the order being passed in Writ Petition filed by the petitioner challenging the order under the Right to Information Act. All contentions on merits are kept open.
1/2
Dusane
20 wp 2260.2015.doc
3 The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as
aforesaid.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
Dr. Pardeshi Balkrishna Patil
Slum Re-Development Authority & Ors.
Shantanu Kemkar
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
