Writ petition challenging the validity of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 1984 and Rules, 1985. Petitioners did not appear. Companion petitions withdrawn. Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)W.P. No. 2224 of 2000
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.
Writ Petition No. 2224 of 2000
District : Aurangabad
1. People's Co-operative Bank, Hingoli, Having Head Office at Hingoli.
2.Sanjay s/o. Anantrao Rajeshwar,
Aged : Major,
Occupation : Manager,
at present,
Aurangabad Branch,
R/o. C/o. People's Co-op. Bank,
Hingoli,
Branch Aurangabad,
Khadkeshwar, Aurangabad. .. Petitioners.
versus
1. The Union of India.
2. The Central Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Krishi Bhavan, Sansad Marg, New Delhi.
3. The State of Maharashtra.
4. The Commissioner for Co-operation and Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Maharashtra State, Pune.
5. The Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Amravati Division, District Amravati. .. Respondents.
...........
(2)W.P. No. 2224 of 2000
Mr. Anil Kasliwal, Advocate, for the petitioners (Absent).
Mr. Bhushan B. Kulkarni, Standing Counsel, for respondent nos.01 and 02.
Mr. A.S. Shinde, Asst. Government Pleader, for respondent nos.03 to 05.
...........
CORAM : V.M. KANADE &
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 04TH JANUARY 2017
ORAL ORDER :
None appears on behalf of the petitioners.
The learned Standing Counsel present on behalf of
respondent nos.01 and 02 - Union of India, and the
learned Asst. Government Pleader present on behalf of
respondent nos.03 to 05 - State of Maharashtra.
02.The petitioners have challenged the validity
of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 1984,
andwithMulti-StateCo-operativeSocieties
(Registration, Membership, Direction and Management,
Settlement of Disputes, Appeal and Revision) Rules,
1985.
03.The other companion petitions challenging
the validity of the said Act and rules have been
withdrawn by the petitioners therein. It appears
that the petitioners are not keen in pursuing the
petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for want
(3)W.P. No. 2224 of 2000
of prosecution. Rule discharged. No order as to
costs.
( Sangitrao S. Patil ) ( V.M. Kanade )
JUDGE JUDGE
...........
puranik / WP2224.00
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to adjudicate on the validity of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 1984 and Rules, 1985 challenging that Act.
Whether the petition should be dismissed for lack of prosecution despite no opposite appearance.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
People's Co-operative Bank
Sanjay s/o. Anantrao Rajeshwar
Union of India
Central Registrar, Co-operative Societies
State of Maharashtra
Commissioner for Co-operation and Registrar of Co-operative Societies
V.M. Kanade
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court