Petitioner challenged an order regarding entry in land records as executor. Court dismissed the writ, noting the existence of an appeal under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and that revenue records do not determine title.
Petitioner dismissed with liberty to avail alternate remedies available under the law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25-WP.2183.2015.doc
1/3
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2183 OF 2015
Anil Meghraj Gehi ...Petitioner Versus The Collector and Ors. ...Respondents
Ms.Duraiya Saifuddin Retiwala a/w Ms.Rashida M.Y.Retiwala, for the Petitioner
Ms.Geeta Shastri, A.G.P for the Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3.
CORAM : DR. MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J. & M. S. SONAK, J.
DATE : 7th NOVEMBER, 2017
P.C. :
December, 2014 made by the Superintendent of Land Records. The complaint of the petitioner is that the petitioner's name has been entered
into the land records but the same has been entered in the capacity as
Executor and not as Owner.
25-WP.2183.2015.doc
2/3
25-WP.2183.2015.doc
3/3
petitioner is at liberty to avail the alternate remedies available under the
law.
M. S. SONAK, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be entertained given the availability of an alternate remedy under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code?
Anil Meghraj Gehi
The Collector and Ors.
DR. MANJULA CHELLUR
M. S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
