Single judge disposed of writ petition seeking expedition of pending appeal concerning suit land possession. Court directed District Judge to decide review application by 15.1.2018.
Direction issued to decide RCS No.46 of 2014 review on or before 15.1.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2055 OF 2017
SHIVAJI PUNDLIK MALI AND ANOTHER VERSUS SOPAN LAXMAN MALI
Advocate for Petitioners : Shri Godbharle Vinod D. Advocate for Respondent : Shri Deshmukh R.B.
... CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. Dated: October 03, 2017 ...
PER COURT :-
akl/d
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
2 - WRIT PETITION NO. 2055 OF 2017
( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )
akl/d
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition to expedite pending appeal regarding suit land should be allowed due to possession disruption.
Whether a direction should be issued to the District Judge to decide the review application by a specified deadline.
SHIVAJI PUNDLIK MALI AND ANOTHER
SOPAN LAXMAN MALI
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
