Allowed

Shri. Sagar Dattatraya Magdum and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through the Prin. Secretary (Revenue), Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.

Bombay HC23 Feb 2017WP/2018/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the Supreme Court analyzed ownership of land in Kolhapur that was deleted from acquisition lists via prior orders. It directed the respondents to comply with those specific orders within 10 weeks if they consider them valid, dismissing the petition otherwise.

What did the court decide?

Direction to comply with orders dated 10th April 1991 and 7th May 2007 within 10 weeks.

Shri. Sagar Dattatraya Magdum and Ors. Vs the State of… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

skn 1/2 2018.16-wp.sxw

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 2018 OF 2016

¶4

Shri Sagar Dattatraya Magdum and others. V/s.	...	Petitioners.
The State of Maharashtra and others.	...	Respondents.

¶5

Vijay Killedar for the petitioners.

¶6

P.P.Kakade, AGP for the State.

¶7

CORAM : DR.MANJULA CHELLUR, C.J. AND G.S.KULKARNI , J. DATE : 23^rd February 2017.

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

The petitioners are the owners of land being Block No.268/A situated in village- Terwad, taluka- Shirol, districtKolhapur. The land was subject matter of acquisition for rehabilitation of the project affected persons of the Doodhganga Dam Project. The petitioners have relied upon the orders dated 10^th April 1991 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Pune and order 7^th May 2007 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer No.12, Kolhapur by which the respondents have deleted the land from acquisition.

¶10

skn 2/2 2018.16-wp.sxw

¶11

The grievance of the petitioners is that despite these orders the respondents have not given effect to the said orders and necessary action to delete the name of respondent No.3 from the revenue records pertaining to the said land has not been undertaken. The petitioners are, therefore, before us in the present petition.

¶12

Considering the prayers as made in the writ petition for direction to the respondents to give effect to comply the orders dated 19^th April 1991 and 7^th May 2007, we consider it appropriate to dispose of this petition by directing the respondents to comply with the said orders within a period of 10 weeks from today, in the event the respondent is of the opinion that the said orders are legal, valid and subsisting.

¶13

The petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

¶14

(G.S.KULKARNI, J.) CHIEF JUSTICE

Shri. Sagar Dattatraya Magdum and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through the Prin. Secretary (Revenue), Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Sagar Dattatraya Magdum and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through the Prin. Secretary (Revenue), Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Pandit Dnyanoba Tapkir Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Special Land Acquisition Officer NO.17 and Ors.

Shri. Maruti Baburao Tambe and Ors. Vs the Divisional Commissioner, Pune and Ors.

Shri. Vitthal Krushna Bhagat and Ors. Vs the Divisional Commissioner, Pune and Ors.

Shri Tatu Kondiba Patil and Ors. Vs Shri Anandrao Khanderao Gaikwad

Laxman Jiwaji Jadhav Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Ganpat Kondiba Kudekar (Decd) through Lrs Vilas Ganpat Kudekar Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.