Disposed

Rambahadoor @ Rembahadoor Bake Bihari Pal and 4 Ors. v. the Chief Executive Officer and 4 Ors.

Bombay HC29 Nov 2017WP/188/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court directed the SRA and developer to allot and hand over permanent alternate accommodation to eligible petitioner No. 1 within four weeks. Allotment to petitioners 2, 4, and 5 is subject to the outcome of an appeal being filed by them, conditioned upon filing an undertaking to vacate and return possession if the appeal fails.

What did the court decide?

Directed allotment and handover of permanent accommodation to Petitioner No. 1 within 4 weeks; conditional allotment to Petitioners 2, 4, and 5 pending appeal.

Rambahadoor @ Rembahadoor Bake Bihari Pal and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2017)

901-wp 188-17

psv

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.188 OF 2017

¶6

Rambahadoor @ Rembahadoor Bake Bihari Pal & Ors.

¶7

..Petitioners

¶8

Vs. The Chief Executive Officer, SRA & Ors. ..Respondents

¶9

Mr.S.G. Kudle for Petitioners.

¶10

Mr.M.M. Vashi, Senior Advocate with Ms.Aparna Deokar for Respondent Nos.4 and 5.

¶11

Mr.A.A. Dasai for Respondent No.1-SRA. Mr.Kunal Bhange, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. Mr.Sagar Patil for MCGM. Petitioner No.1 in person present.

¶12

CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.

¶13

DATE : 29^th NOVEMBER 2017

¶14

P.C.:

¶15

After arguing for some time, the learned Counsel for Respondent Nos.4 and 5 submits that as regards the petitioner No.1 Rambahadoor alias Rembahadoor Bake Bihari Pal, the fourth and the fifth respondent will allot and hand over the possession of alternate permanent accommodation to him within 4 weeks from today as he has been found eligible by the SRA.

¶16

We record the said statement which has been made in the presence of the Chairman of the respondent No.4 as also on behalf

¶17

¶18

901-wp 188-17

¶19

of the developer-fifth respondent.

¶20

As regards the petitioner nos.2, 4 and 5, keeping in view the fact that the SRA has held them eligible slum dwellers and in regard to challenge to the said order, the fourth and fifth respondents are being permitted to file appeal by this Court by a separate order passed today in Writ Petition (L.) No.430 of 2017, we direct that the allotment and possession of permanent alternate accommodation be given to the second, fourth and the fifth respondents within four weeks from today, which will be subject to out come of the appeal as will be filed by the fourth and the fifth respondents.

¶21

The possession shall be given as aforesaid to the petitioner nos.2, 4 and 5 on their filing unconditional undertaking before this Court within two weeks from today that in the event of their failure before the appellate authority and before this Court, if occasion arises to file petition they will vacate the alternate permanent accommodation which will be provided to them by the fourth respondent and the fifth respondent and shall hand over peaceful possession of it to them within 8 weeks.

¶22

So far as the petitioner No.3 is concerned, we are not passing any order as in his case the matter has been remanded by the SRA to the Deputy Collector and the same is pending before the Deputy Collector.

¶23

¶24

901-wp 188-17

¶25

The petitioners' contention about non grant of transit accommodation to them till the time they will be allotted and given possession of the permanent alternate accommodation the same is kept open with liberty to the petitioners to raise the same before the appropriate authority.

¶26

With the aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶27

[G.S. KULKARNI, J.]

¶28

[SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.]

Rambahadoor @ Rembahadoor Bake Bihari Pal and 4 Ors. v. the Chief Executive Officer and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rambahadoor @ Rembahadoor Bake Bihari Pal and 4 Ors. v. the Chief Executive Officer and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhupen Tokarshi Gala Vs State of Maharashtra and 7 Others

Nana Sambhaji Jadhav Vs the Chief Executive Officer, the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and Anr.

Mrs.Laxmi Ravindra Jakkani and 8 Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and 4 Ors.

M/S Shakti Sra Co. Opeative Housing Society Ltd. and Anr. Vs Chief Executive Officer and the Secretary and 8 Others

Runwal Homes Private Limited and Anr. Vs Union of India through the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs and 4 Ors.

Shabbir Feroz Arsiwala and 18 Ors. Vs Union of India and Anr.