Petitioner sought withdrawal of Criminal Writ Petition No. 17 of 2016 on ground of settled matter. Court allowed withdrawal and vacated interim orders.
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8.wp-17.16.doc
sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.17 OF 2016
Ratanlal Tamakhuwala … Petitioner
vs.
State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Phinaz Merchant i/b.M/s. Apex Law Partners for the Petitioner. Mr. P.H.Gaikwad, APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A.K. MENON, J. DATED : 3 rd JULY, 2017
P.C.
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition since
the matter has been settled. In the circumstances, I pass the following order:-
(i) Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn.
(ii) Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(iii) The Registry to intimate this order to the Metropolitan Magistrate's 63rd Court, Andheri.
(A. K. MENON, J.)
1/1
Ratanlal Tamakhuwala
State of Maharashtra
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
