made application on 29th September, 2011 before Collector, Mumbai for recording names of all the legal heirs and representatives of Khimchand Vardhan in respect of C.S. No. 611 of Byculla Division, 43, Kamathipura Lane 8th Lane, Mumbai. By order dated 26th November, 2012, Collector Mumbai rejected the application by directing the petitioner to approach the competent Court for obtaining succession certificate. Aggrieved by that order, petitioner preferred appeal before the Tribunal. On 1st July, 2016, the learned Member [Judicial] of the Tribunal pronounced the order and partly allowed the appeal and set aside the order dated 26th November, 2012 and remitted the matter to the Collector, Mumbai City for deciding it afresh. He has taken me through the operative order dated 1st July, 2016 at Exhibit A, pages 234-235/ However, subsequently, learned Member [Administrative] passed order on 16th June, 2017 dismissing the appeal. He submitted that once operative part was pronounced on 1st July, 2016 by the learned Judicial Member of the Tribunal, the learned Member Administrative, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal could not have passed order inconsistent with the operative part of the order.
