This petition was dismissed for want of prosecution by the Bombay High Court. The court recorded that the petitioner had none appearing for them, leading to dismissal without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13-wp-1635-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1635 OF 2016
Praveenkumar Shrawan Shamkuwar ...Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Another
...Respondents
None for the Petitioner
Ms. R.M. Shinde, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR &
M. S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 15, 2017
P.C.:
. None for the Petitioner. The Petition is dismissed for
want of prosecution.
(M. S. SONAK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Vishal Parekar
Praveenkumar Shrawan Shamkuwar
The State of Maharashtra
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
