Disposed
Reena Richard and 2 Ors. v. State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and 2 Ors.
Bombay HCWP/16/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
wpl-3460-17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.3460 OF 2017
Reena Richard & Ors. … Petitioners
vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Ms. Reena Richard for the Petitioners.
Mr.H.Takke, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3/State. Mr.Abhijit U.Mahadik i/b U.B.Mahadik for the Respondent No.4.
CORAM : A.A. SAYED &
MANISH PITALE, JJ.
DATED : 15 DECEMBER 2017
P.C.:
After hearing the matter for sometime, the learned Counsel for the Petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to challenge the election before the appropriate Forum.
(MANISH PITALE, J.)
(A.A.SAYED, J.)
1/1
Uday.P.Kambli
Reena Richard
Uday P. Kambli
State of Maharashtra
A.A. Sayed
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court