This is a writ petition challenging rejection of admission to BHMS Course under SC quota. The court held that since the petition was filed after the cut-off date, the prayer could not be considered and was rejected.
Prayer for admission to BHMS Course is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 144 OF 2017
(Varsha D/o. Vijaykumar Gaikwad Vs. The State of
Maharashtra and others)
Mr. N.B. Narwade, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for the respondents/State
CORAM :V.M. KANADE AND
SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 9th January, 2017
PER COURT:
Heard.
2.This petition has been filed after the cut-off
date and therefore, it is not possible to consider the
prayer claimed by the petitioner for admission to
B.H.M.S. Course from Scheduled Caste Category. The
petition stands rejected.
npj/wp144-2017
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition filed after the cut-off date for reservation can be considered for admission to BHMS Course
Whether the delay in filing the petition warrants rejection of the prayer for admission
Varsha D/o. Vijaykumar Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra and others
V.M. Kanade
Sangitrao S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court