In a writ petition, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay directed the respondent to expedite the petitioner's stay application filed in a revision challenging an order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Pune Division.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
920-WP-14043.2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 14043 OF 2017
Mangalmurti Developers
...Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
...Respondents
Mr. Vishal Kolekar for the Petitioner.
Mr.Sandeep Babar, AGP for the Respondent nos. 1 to 4 State.
Mrm N. Walawalkar, Sr. Advocate a/w Mr.S.M. Sabrad for respondent no. 5.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & R.G. KETKAR, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 21, 2017
P.C.:
Learned Counsel for the petitioner has restricted his prayer to direct respondent no.1 to consider petitioner's application for stay filed in the revision challenging the order of Additional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune dated 6.10.017.
stay application in the revision challenging the order dated
1/2
nilegaonkar
920-WP-14043.2017.doc
6.10.2017 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
(R.G.KETKAR, J.)
(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
nilegaonkar
Mangalmurti Developers
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
