The petition was withdrawn. The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn. All merits and contentions were left open without any determination.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
osk 913-wp-1354-2016.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1354 OF 2016
Rajesh Sheth & Ors. … Petitioners V/s. Traxpo Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. … Respondents
Mr.Dinesh Kumar A. Dubey a/w.Mr.Ravi Agarwal for the Petitioners. Mr.Vivek Kantawal a/w. Mr.Amey Patil i/b. Vivek Kantawal & Co. for Respondent No.1. Ms.N.S. Jain, A.P.P. for Respondent No.2-State.
CORAM : DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.
DATE : 20th DECEMBER, 2017.
P.C. :
1] After arguing the matter for some time, when the issue relating to maintainability of this Writ Petition was raised, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw this petition to take appropriate proceedings before the trial Court in accordance with law. 2] Writ Petition is accordingly stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as sought.
3] Rule is discharged in view of disposal of the Writ Petition. 4] It is made clear that this Court has not gone in to the merits of this case and all points and contentions raised by the parties are expressly left open.
[DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]
1/1
Rajesh Sheth & Ors.
Traxpo Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
