Disposed
Sujata Pandurang Jogale v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/1352/2003
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1352.2003
1/1
Dusane
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1352 OF 2003 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3151 OF 2003
Kum. Sujata Pandurang Jogale
.... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. .... Respondents
None for the Petitioner. Mrs. N.S. Jain, A.P.P. for the respondent- State.
Coram : Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J. Date : 23rd February, 2017
P.C.
1 Though the petition is shown on the board for dismissal, the petitioner and advocate are absent. The Writ Petition is dismissed for default. In view of dismissal of the Writ Petition, the Criminal Application does not survive. The same is accordingly disposed off.
(Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.)
Kum. Sujata Pandurang Jogale
State of Maharashtra
R.P. SondurBaldota
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court