Petitioner sought withdrawal of writ petition on ground that respondent No.2 had withdrawn her candidature. Court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; petition disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp1281.17
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1281 OF 2017
(PRADIP LAXMAN MARKAD VS. RETURNING OFFICER JALNA DISTRICT CENTRAL
CO OPERATIVEBANK LTD JALNA AND OTHERS)
Office Notes,Office MemorandaCourt's or Judge's orders
of Coram,appearances, Court's
orders or directions andCORAM : S.B. SHUKRE,J.
Registrar's ordersDATED : 23.02.2017
Mr.S.V. Deshmukh, Adv. for petitioner.
Mr.S.K. Kadam, Advocate for R-1.
Mr.R.T. Nagargoje, Advocate for R-2.
Mr.K.J. Suryawanshi, Advocate for R-4.
Mr.S.K. Tambe, AGP for respondent/State
1.Learned Counsel for the
petitioner, on instructions, seeks
leave of the Court to withdraw the
petition, submitting that respondent
No.2 has withdrawn her candidature.
2.Leave to withdraw the petition
is granted and it is disposed of as
withdrawn. No costs.
[S.B. SHUKRE,J.]
snk/2017/FEB17 /wp1281.17
PRADIP LAXMAN MARKAD
RETURNING OFFICER JALNA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO OPERATIVEBANK LTD JALNA
OTHERS
S.B. SHUKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court