Petitioners withdrew the writ petition as the underlying matter was amicably settled between parties.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1219 OF 2013
Hemant H. Jagdale & Ors. … Petitioners V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
Mr.C,S, Joshi for the Petitioners. Mr.S.R. Aagarkar, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.
DATE : 11th DECEMBER, 2017.
P.C. :
board.
2] Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that in view of the matter amicably settled between the parties and accordingly the consent terms filed in P.A. No.2399 of 2010 in Family Court at Bandra,
the Petitioners do not want to proceed with this Writ Petition.
[DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]
1/1
Hemant H. Jagdale & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
