Disposed

Aditya Singh Bhatti v. Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal and 2 Ors.

Bombay HC5 Jan 2017WP/119/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge bench disposed of two writ petitions against school authorities. Granting liberty to petitioners to file individual representations regarding an impugned order before the Dean of school no.2 school to examine grievances and pass appropriate individual orders.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to Petitioners to file individual representations; Dean to examine cases, grant hearing, and pass individual orders within 10 days.

Aditya Singh Bhatti Vs Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal and… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

1 of 2 DB.08.WP(L).3173.2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION (L) NO.3173 OF 2016

¶4

Gaurav Gorde and others Petitioners

¶5

versus

¶6

Shri Vile Parle Kelwani Mandal & others Respondents

¶7

WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.5 OF 2017

¶8

Aditya Singh Bhati Petitioner versus

¶9

Shri Vile Parle Kelwani Mandal and others Respondents

¶10

Mr.Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Saranath Sariputta for Petitioners.

¶11

Mr.P.K.Dhakephalkar, Senior Advocate, with S.K.Srivastava, Ms.Manorama Mohanty, Mr.A.P.Singh and Mr.Kushal Amin i/by S.K.Srivastav & Co. for Respondents.

¶12

CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

¶13

DATE : 5^th January 2017

¶14

PC :

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the parties. After hearing the matter at length, on the basis of broad consensus arrived at during the course of hearing, we dispose of the petition by giving liberty to the Petitioners herein to file individual representations about their grievance in respect of impugned order dated 22nd November 2016. The Petitioners shall submit detailed individual representations along with supporting documents, if any, before the Dean of Respondent

¶16

2 of 2 DB.08.WP(L).3173.2016

¶17

no.2 School on or before 9th January 2017. On receipt of such representation/s from each of the Petitioners, the Dean of Respondent no.2 school shall give an opportunity of personal hearing to each of the Petitioners and/or his one representative/parent or both, and after giving inspection of relevant documents to each of the Petitioners, shall pass appropriate individual orders in regard to the grievances raised by each of the Petitioners in their respective petitions, within ten days from the date of hearing on the representations. Needless to state that Respondent no.2 Dean shall examine every individual case and the reasons assigned by each Petitioner in regard to his/her absence and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶18

With the above directions, both the petitions are disposed of.

¶19

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)

¶20

MST

Aditya Singh Bhatti v. Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aditya Singh Bhatti v. Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandra Kanishk B. Vs Union of India and 4 Ors.

Dipesh Agrawal Son of Krishna Kumar Agrwal and Anr. Vs Svkm'S Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies and Anr.

Gangaram Atmaram Khambal Vs Head Master, Vidyamandir High School and Ors.

Gourav Gorde and 29 Ors. Vs Shri Vile Parle Kelwani Mandal and 2 Ors.

Smt. Vaishali Sandesh Bibave Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Kiran Shankar Lagoo Vs the Chairman, Grievances Cell Committee and Ors.