High Court allowed withdrawal of criminal writ petition as trial concluded pending Supreme Court decision.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn; no orders as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5.wp-1186.09.doc
sbw IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1186 OF 2009
Sagar Babu Parmar & Ors. … Petitioners vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. Prashant Raul h/f S.P.Kadam for the Petitioners.
Mr. Vinod Chate,APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A.K. MENON, J. DATED : 6 th JULY, 2017
P.C.
The learned counsel for the applicant states that the trial in the present matter has been concluded. Vide order dated 10 th March, 2010 this petition was adjourned sine die with liberty to move the Court after the Supreme Court had decided the issue pending before it and arising in the above petition. Today in view of the statement of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the trial is been concluded nothing survives in this petition. Accordingly, I pass the following order:-
(i) Petition is allowed to be withdrawn.
(ii) No orders as to costs.
1/1
Sagar Babu Parmar & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
