Disposed

Dnyaneshwar Namdeo Lakde v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC10 Aug 2017WP/11657/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner's appointment as a Full Time Trained Teacher. The Court directed the respondent to reconsider the proposal, give a hearing, and pass a reasoned order within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent to reconsider appointment proposal, provide hearing, and pass reasoned order within six weeks.

Dnyaneshwar Namdeo Lakde Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

WP No. 11657/16

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

932 WRIT PETITION NO. 11657 OF 2016

¶5

DNYANESHWAR NAMDEO LAKDE

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶8

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S.V. Natu

¶9

AGP for Respondents 1 & 2 : Mrs. V.N. Patil/Jadhav Advocate for Respondents 3 & 4 : Mr. P.V. Jadhavar h/f. Mr. S.V.

¶10

Dixit

¶11

CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & N.W. SAMBRE, JJ. DATED : August 10, 2017.

¶12

PER COURT :

¶13

. With the consent of learned counsel for parties heard finally.

¶14

Challenging the letter dated 4.11.2016 issued by respondent No. 2 rejecting the approval of the petitioner's appointment as Full Time Trained Teacher with effect from 1.11.2014, the petitioner has filed the petition.

¶15

According to the petitioner the reasons assigned in the impugned order for rejecting the aforesaid proposal are contrary to the facts on record. He submits that as per

¶16

WP No. 11657/16

¶17

¶18

respondent Nos. 3 and 4 they had submitted the roster along with the proposal. So far as the no objection, in terms of the circular dated 30.6.2016 is concerned, according to him, the said circular dated 30.6.2016 will not be applicable to the petitioner since the petitioner was appointed in the year 2005 which is much prior to coming into force of the aforesaid circular.

¶19

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of by directing respondent No. 2 to reconsider the matter of approval of petitioner's appointment taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner's appointment was prior to the said circular and respondent Nos. 3 and 4 be directed to submit the roster once again if the same has already not been attached with the proposal.

¶20

In view of the aforesaid prayer we are inclined to dispose of the petition by directing respondent No. 2 to reconsider the petitioner's aforesaid proposal and take the decision afresh uninfluenced by the earlier rejection dated 4.11.2016.

¶21

WP No. 11657/16

¶22

¶23

The petitioner is at liberty to submit detail representation with supporting documents before respondent No. 2. Before taking decision respondent No. 2 shall give opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and respondent Nos. 3 and 4. Let the decision as aforesaid be taken by respondent No.

¶24

2 within six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. We expect that the respondent No. 2 shall pass a reasoned order.

¶25

With the aforesaid directions, the petition is disposed of.

¶26

[N.W. SAMBRE, J.] [SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.]

¶27

ssc/

Dnyaneshwar Namdeo Lakde v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dnyaneshwar Namdeo Lakde v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anita Devidas Desle Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Matoshri Anusaya Madhyamik and Ucchya Madhamik Vidhyalaya through Its Secretary G G More Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Mah. Rajya Z P Bahuuddeshiya Arogya Seva Karmachari Madhyavarti Sanghatana through Its President Ra Vs the State of Maharashtra

Amit Prafulla Mhetre Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Gopalkrishna Govindrao More Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Pramod Deelip Kshirsagar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others