Disposed

Vitthal Refined Sugars Ltd. v. the Maharashtra State Electricity Development Company Ltd. and Ors.

Bombay HC24 Nov 2017WP/11447/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of a writ petition regarding power plant generation claims, directing the State to consider the petitioner's claim on merits if the earlier procedure continues, or to allow participation in tenders if new bids are invited.

What did the court decide?

Directed State to consider petitioner's claim on merits if earlier procedure continues; otherwise, petitioner may participate in tenders in accordance with law.

Vitthal Refined Sugars Ltd. Vs the… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2017)

902-wp 11447-16

psv

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.11447 OF 2016

¶6

Vitthal Refined Sugars Ltd. ..Petitioner Vs. The Maharashtra State Electricity Development Company Ltd. & Ors. ..Respondents

¶7

Mr.Tejesh Dande for Petitioner.

¶8

Mr.Ashish Singh i/b. M/s.DSK Legal for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr.R.S.Pawar, AGP for Respondent No.3.

¶9

Mr.Nitin Gaikwad, Under Secretary, Urja-7, Industries, Energy and Labour Department, Mantralaya.

¶10

CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.

¶11

DATE : 24^th NOVEMBER 2017

¶12

P.C.:

¶13

After arguing for sometime, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition may be disposed of by directing the respondent Nos.3 and 4-State to consider the petitioner's claim in case they take a decision for enhancing the target of power plant generation from Biomass-based project to Bagasse based project.

¶14

The learned AGP, on instructions, submits that now the policy of the State is to invite bids. He however, submits that if the policy decision is taken enabling the State Government to consider the petitioner's claim, the petitioner's claim will be considered in

¶15

2 902-wp 11447-16

¶16

accordance with law on its own merits. He further submits that in case the bids are invited, it is aways open for the petitioner to participate in the bids and as per the qualification, the bids will be considered and appropriate decision will be taken.

¶17

In view of the aforesaid submission, we dispose of this petition by directing the State to consider the petitioner's claim in accordance with law on its own merits, in case the earlier procedure is continued. However, in case the State decides to issue tenders, it is open for the petitioner to participate in the bids in accordance with law and terms and conditions of the bids.

¶18

With the aforesaid direction, the petition is disposed of.

¶19

[G.S. KULKARNI, J.]

¶20

[SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.]

Vitthal Refined Sugars Ltd. v. the Maharashtra State Electricity Development Company Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vitthal Refined Sugars Ltd. v. the Maharashtra State Electricity Development Company Ltd. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr Mrs Kaushal Kadam and 2 Others Vs Union of India through Govt Pleader and 4 Others

Komal Ritesh Maniar and Anr. Vs Shri Ritesh Naresh Maniar and Ors.

Express Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay and Ors.

Sameer Subhash Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.and Suresh Jagshi Vira and 14 Ors.(Applicant)

Sameer Subhash Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors. and Jyoti Zaverchand Gala (Applicant)

Sameer Subhash Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors. and Jyoti Zaverchand Gala (Applicant)