High Court of Bombay disposed of writ petition as infructuous after respondent filed consent terms showing settlement on DRT-I, Mumbai bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11221 OF 2017
Mr. Sudhiriccharam Dixit And Anr. ...Petitioners Versus Gruh Finance Ltd. ...Respondent ----
None for the Petitioner.
Mr.Akash S. Acharya for Respondent.
CORAM : A.A. SAYED & MANISH PITALE, JJ.
DATE : 19th DECEMBER 2017
P.C.
(MANISH PITALE, J.)
(A.A.SAYED, J.)
Mr. Sudhiriccharam Dixit And Anr.
Gruh Finance Ltd.
A.A. SAYED
MANISH PITALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
