Petitioner requested withdrawal of the writ petition citing consent terms accepted by the Respondents before the Debt Recovery Tribunal on 28th November, 2017. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Disposed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP. 1102-17.doc
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 1102 OF 2017
Justdial Limited … Petitioner Vs. The Registrar, Debt Recovery Tribunal & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Yuvraj Choksy i/b Veritas Legal, for the Petitioner. Ms. Sapana Rachure i/b T. N. Tripathi & Co., for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI, & MANISH PITALE, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 4, 2017 PC :
. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner
states that in view of the consent terms filed before the learned Debt
Recovery Tribunal, Mumbai and on the basis of which an order dated 28th November, 2017 passed by the DRT, Petitioner does not wish to prosecute the petition. Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Sd/Sd/[MANISH PITALE, J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Justdial Limited
The Registrar, Debt Recovery Tribunal
Manish Pitale
B. R. Gavai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
