The High Court directed the State to decide a pending proposal for the appointment of a 'Shikshan Sevak' within eight weeks as the matter was pending since 2015.
Direction to Respondent No.2 to decide the appointment proposal within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
spb/
29wpl15743-17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L.) NO. 15743 OF 2017
Chetan S/o. Diliprao Patil … Petitioner.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Others. … Respondents.
Mr. Vaibhav A. Sugdare, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Kavita Salunke, AGP for the State.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE,JJ.
DATE : 18th SEPTEMBER, 2017
FINAL ORDER :
On hearing the learned counsel appearing for the parties, we are inclined to dispose of this petition as the Petitioner's case for grant of approval to the appointment of “Shikshan Sevak” of which the proposal was already sent by the Management on 10.09.2015, is pending since 2015 so also the representation dated 05.06.2017. Therefore, Respondent No.2 is directed to decide the same as early as possible, preferably within eight weeks in accordance with law.
The Petition is disposed of in the above terms with liberty. No order as to costs.
(SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)
1/1
Borey
Chetan S/o. Diliprao Patil
The State of Maharashtra
Anoop V. Mohta
Bharati H. Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
