The court accepted the petitioner society's application to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the petition accepted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
hvn
1
927
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 108 OF 2017
The Dimbhe Jalashay Shramik Adiwasi Machhimar Sahakakri
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra … Respondents
Mr.Nikhilesh Pote for the petitioner.
Mr.Rohit Sakhadeo for respondent no. 2.
Mr. N.C. Walimbe, AGP for respondent nos. 1, 3 and 4.
Mr. Motiram Dagadu Gengaje, Chairman of the petitioner society present in person.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & R.G. KETKAR, JJ. DECEMBER 14, 2017
P.C.:
Learned Counsel for the petitioner on instructions from the
Chairman of the Petitioner society, who is present in court, seeks
leave to withdraw the petition. Prayer is accepted. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(R.G. KETKAR, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
The Dimbhe Jalashay Shramik Adiwasi Machhimar Sahakakri
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
