Writ petition challenging respondent bank actions dismissed on grounds of availability of alternate remedy without exercising extraordinary jurisdiction.
Writ petition dismissed keeping option open for alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp10673.17
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.10673 OF 2017
(M/s Maharashtra Shetkari Sugars Ltd Factory Shri Uttam Nagar Beed
and others Vs Punjab National Bank Mumbai and others)
Office Notes,Office MemorandaCourt's or Judge's orders
of Coram,appearances, Court's
orders or directions andCORAM : R.M. BORDE &
Registrar's orders S.M. GAVHANE, JJ.
DATED : 29.08.2017
Mr.Ganesh V. Mohekar, Advocate for the
petitioners
.In view of the availability of
alternate remedy as available in law
the writ petition need not be
entertained in exercise of extra
ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226
of the Constitution of India.
2.Keeping option open for the
petitioner to avail the alternate
remedy, the writ petition stands
dismissed.
[S.M. GAVHANE,J.] [R.M. BORDE, J.]
VishalK /wp10673.17
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be entertained in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226, given the availability of an alternate remedy.
M/s Maharashtra Shetkari Sugars Ltd Factory Shri Uttam Nagar Beed and others
Punjab National Bank Mumbai and others
R.M. BORDE
S.M. GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court