The High Court dismissed a writ petition allowed to be withdrawn by the petitioner. No order as to costs was made.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8-WP1057-17.DOC
Atul
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1057 OF 2017
Rishika Chandrapratap Patil…Petitioner
Versus
The Brihan Mumbai Mahanagar Palika & Ors…Respondents
…Petitioner
Mr JM D’Silva, for the Petitioner.
Mrs Pooja Yadav, for the Respondent-BMC.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 30th October 2017
PC:-
1. Mr D’Silva tenders a formal application for withdrawal with an accompanying agreement. This is taken on record and marked “X” for identification.
2. The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There will be no order as to costs.
(G. S. PATEL, J)
Page 1 of 1
30th October 2017
Rishika Chandrapratap Patil
The Brihan Mumbai Mahanagar Palika
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court