Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn with no costs.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
spb/
911wpl20704-17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 20704 OF 2017
Mrs. Archana Hareram Bhasin
… Petitioner.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents.
Ms. Sangita S. Walke, Advocate i/by Law Juris for the Petitioner.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA AND SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE,JJ.
DATE : 12th SEPTEMBER, 2017
ORDER :
Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition.
In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
(SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)
1/1
Borey
Mrs. Archana Hareram Bhasin
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Anoop V. Mohta
Bharati H. Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
