Disposed

Bhagwan Shivram Madhe and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC6 Sept 2017WP/10149/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the respondent authorities to decide pending applications for the post of Shikshan Sevak by the petitioners on merits within 8 weeks, disposing of the writ petitions accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Direction to decide pending applications for the post of Shikshan Sevak by the petitioners and Respondent No. 3 on merits within 8 weeks.

Bhagwan Shivram Madhe and Anr. Vs the State of… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2017)

¶1

WPST. 18890-17

¶2

VPH

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION (St.) No. 18890 OF 2017

¶5

Bhagwan Shivram Madhe & Anr. … Petitioners Vs.

¶6

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents

¶7

AND

¶8

WRIT PETITION No. 8604 OF 2017

¶9

Dashrath Surya Raut … Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents

¶10

¶11

Mr. Vinod P. Sangvikar, for the Petitioner in WPST. 18390/2017. Mr. Vinod P. Sangvikar i/b Gajendra D. Jain, for Respondent in WP. 8604/2017.

¶12

Mr. Manoj Patil, for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 in both petitions. Mr. A. P. Vanarse, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 in both petitions.

¶13

¶14

CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA, & Smt. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.

¶15

DATE : SEPTEMBER 6, 2017

¶16

FINAL ORDER :

¶17

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective

¶18

parties. We are inclined to dispose of this petition as application / representation dated 29.8.2013 filed by Respondent No. 3

¶19

1 / 2

¶20

WPST. 18890-17

¶21

Management, and the application / representation dated 26.3.2017 filed by the Petitioner, are still pending for approval to the post of Shikshan Sevak.

¶22

We direct the Respondent authorities to decide the said applications / representations of Respondent No. 3 and the Petitioners, on merits and in accordance with law, as early as possible preferably within a period of 8 weeks. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of in the aforesaid terms with liberty to apply.

¶23

By consent, Writ Petition No. 8604 of 2017 is taken on board. As the petition is covered by the above order and the respondents in both the petitions are same, so also the issue raised in both petitions are same, we are inclined to dispose of this petition also on the aforesaid terms, directing the Respondent authorities to decide the application / representation of the petitioner dated 26.3.2017 on merits and in accordance with law, as early as possible preferably within a period of 8 weeks. Writ petition No. 8604 of 2017 is also accordingly disposed of in the aforesaid terms with liberty to apply. No costs.

¶24

Sd/Sd/[Smt. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]

¶25

Vinayak Halemath

¶26

2 / 2

Bhagwan Shivram Madhe and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhagwan Shivram Madhe and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Reeta Rajesh Rai Vs the State of Maharashtra and 5 Ors.

Suman Premchand Yadav Vs the State of Maharashtra and 5 Ors.

Amol Sahebrao Solunke Vs the State of Maharashtra and 5 Ors.

Poonam Radhakisan Survase and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary and Ors.

New Miraj Education Society, Miraj, through President and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Kum. Anjali Gajanan Lade Vs State of Maharashtra , through Its Secretary and Ors.